Revising option status in argument-based decision systems1
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Revising option status in argument-based decision systems1
Decision making is usually based on the comparative evaluation of different op-tions by means of a decision criterion. Recently, the qualitative pessimistic criterionwas articulated in terms of a four-step argumentation process: i) to build argumentsin favor/against each option, ii) to compare and evaluate those arguments, iii) toassign a status for each option, and iv) to rank-...
متن کاملOn Revising Argumentation-Based Decision Systems
Decision making amounts to define a preorder (usually a complete one) on a set of options. Argumentation has been introduced in decision making analysis. In particular, an argument-based decision system has been proposed recently by Amgoud et al. The system is a variant of Dung’s abstract framework. It takes as input a set of options, different arguments and a defeat relation among them, and re...
متن کاملArgument-based decision making in ambient intelligence environments
Decision-making is a cognitive process of the foremost importance to set a line of action under change; it is said to be a psychological construct, being therefore latent and not directly observable. Indeed, issues of construct validity are paramount, where the information gathered would provide insight regarding the construct of emotional intelligence and how one would attempt to clarify its m...
متن کاملComponent-Based Systems1
vs. Concrete Descriptions The requirement to use abstraction in describing the behavioral aspect of a system’s interface leads to the following additional terminology: • A system’s interface description (structural plus behavioral) is called an abstract description of the system. • A description of a system’s interior, i.e., the subsystems that comprise it and their relationships to one another...
متن کاملOn Access Checking in Capability-Based Systems1
Public descriptions of capability-based system designs often do not clarify the necessary details concerning the propagation of access rights within the systems. A casual reader may assume that it is adequate for capabilities to be passed in accordance with the rules for data copying. A system using such a rule cannot enforce either the military security policy or the Bell and LaPadula rules. T...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Logic and Computation
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0955-792X,1465-363X
DOI: 10.1093/logcom/exq057